A big payout for a four letter word
New Zealand – March 2015
Ms Hammond, living and working in Auckland, New Zealand, uploaded to her Facebook page a picture of a cake made by
her for a private dinner party. Both she and a fellow worker had recently resigned from Credit Union Baywide
trading as NZCU Baywide (NZCU Baywide). The party was attended by ten close personal friends, five of whom were
current employees of NZCU Baywide.
What would otherwise have been an unexceptional set of circumstances was transformed by two factors. First, the top
of the cake had been iced with the words “NZCU F*** YOU” while the side of the cake bore the word “C***”.
(Please use your imagination
….. . We have replaced the original letters with the *)
The privacy setting on Ms Hammond’s Facebook page meant only those accepted by her as “friends”
had access to the photograph.
Determined to gain access to the photo, NZCU pressured a junior staff member, who was a Facebook friend of Ms
Hammond, to log into her Facebook account and take a screenshot of the picture for NZCU. Upon receiving the private
image, NZCU:
·
emailed a screenshot that was then distributed to multiple employment
agencies in the Hawke’s Bay area which, along with contemporaneous phone calls from NZCU Baywide, warned against
employing Ms Hammond.
·
sent an internal email outlining the circumstances of Ms Hammond’s resignation; and
·
disclosed the photo to her current employer while placing severe pressure on them to terminate Ms Hammond’s
employment
.
One of the issues Ms Hammond experienced was frustration when she found some members of the executive team did not
listen to her when she cautioned that in her view, NZCU Baywide was at commercial and financial risk for failing to
adhere to the Privacy Act.
Had NZCU failed with regard to privacy in their dealings with the recently departed staff member?
YES, said the Tribunal who found that NZCU breached its privacy obligations to Ms Hammond which requires an agency
that holds personal information to refrain from disclosing that information.
Ms Hammond was awarded $168,000 in compensation, comprising $98,000 for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to
feelings, $38,350 for pecuniary loss of income, $16,177.78 for loss of benefit and $15,543.10 for legal
expenses.
It could be said that this was a great deal of money for a four letter word ED
More at:-
http://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/human-rights-review-tribunal/decisions-of-the-human-rights-review-tribunal/decisions-under-the-privacy-act-1993/2015/hammond-v-credit-union-baywide-2015-nzhrrt-6
|