When a frolic is not
compensatable!
June
2014
When
employees attend a work function, there has often been an expectation that their employer is responsible should
an accident occur. In the case of Australian Leisure and Hospitality Group Pty Ltd v Simon Blackwood (2014) QIRC
105, the opposite was found.
Mrs
Campbell (the deceased) attended a Christmas party at a park near the Noosa River, organised by her employer,
Dan Murphy’s Noosaville. The function was organised through their social club, but the management group for Dan
Murphy’s had sanctioned the function.
During the function, Mrs Campbell decided to take a swim in the Noosa River with another
worker and ran towards the river, diving in head first. In doing so, Mrs Campbell sustained a fatal
injury.
Even
though there was “inducement or encouragement” for Mrs Campbell to attend the function on 31 March 2013, it was
held by the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission (QIRC) that the activity organised by Dan Murphy’s
Noosaville was not “the diving into the Noosa River”.
For the claim to be successful, the injury had to be ‘arising out of, or in the
course of, employment if the employment is a significant contributing factor to causing the injury’ under section
32 of the Act. The QIRC cited Comcare v PVYW [2013] HCA 41, and said
for the injury to be ‘suffered in the course of employment’ it could be:
·
"suffered by an employee whilst engaged in an activity in which the employer has
induced or encouraged the employee to engage or;"
·
"where an injury was suffered at and by reference to a place where the employer had
induced or encouraged the employee to be”
The
Regulator had argued that the activity in question was the Christmas party, and the ALH Group conceded that Mrs
Campbell had been encouraged to attend the event. However, the QIRC decided that the activity in question
was diving into the Noosa River. “Crucially, an inducement or encouragement to be at a particular place does not
provide the necessary connection to employment merely because an employee is injured while engaged in an
activity at that place.”
The QIRC referred
to WorkCover Queensland v BHP (Qld) Worker’s
Compensation Unit (2002) 170 QGIG 142, where Hall P said “[a]n
employee who sustains an injury whilst on a frolic of his
own in his employer's time has no entitlement to compensation”, and concluded that the injury was a result of
Mrs Campbell making.
See More:-
http://www.mullinslaw.com.au/_publications/20140808145802342.pdf
http://www.employsure.com.au/latest-news/bets-comes-employee-safety/
|