My Blog Site whsblog.com   OHS and Safety
 

My Blog Site    whsblog.com

Anything of interest to the OHS Committee in NSW,

People at work, Safety, Travel and anything quirky or funny.

$688,000 awarded for fall at work

29 November 2016  

The Supreme Court has awarded damages totalling $688,000 to an employee who tripped on a protruding metal plate in her work place. 

The case of Kalos v Goodyear & Dunlop Tyres (Aust) Pty Ltd & Anor [2016] VSC 715 involved a customer service representative who tripped and fell on a metal plate protruding from the floor of a corridor at work. 

The injury to the employee's shoulder was considered serious on the grounds that the Plaintiff: 

  • required surgical intervention on two occasions and a manipulation 
  • required extensive ongoing conservative management 
  • continued to suffer pain, restriction of movement and dysfunction affecting the right shoulder 
  • was incapacitated from her pre-injury employment and from a range of domestic activities 
  • continued to require painkilling analgesic medication, and 
  • suffered anxiety and depression. 

The issue before the Court was whether there was any negligence on the part of the employer, Goodyear & Dunlop Tyres Australia Pty Ltd. 

The plaintiff alleged, against both the employer and the owner of premises, that there was a breach of duty on their part in failing to remove the metal plate. The metal plate had been left in place after the employer had conducted refurbishment of the workplace. 

The Court found that the employer’s occupational health and safety representative was aware that the metal plate was loose, and the employer was negligent in failing to take steps, prior to the plaintiff’s fall, to make the plate safe. 

Further, the Court found that the employer, acting reasonably, should have implemented a system of regular inspection to ensure the floor was safe. The metal plate was redundant, the Court said, and the cost of removing the plate compared to the risk it posed to the employees was low. 

The Court held that the owner of the premises had not breached its duty to the plaintiff, because, among other things, the employer had exclusive possession of the premises and moreover, the owner was not aware that the employer had no system in place for inspection and maintenance of the floor premises. 

As there was no breach on the part of the owner of the premises, there were no contribution issues to be determined by the Court. The Court also rejected the employer’s contributory negligence claim. 

The Court awarded  Money

$250,000 for general damages 

$230,000 for past loss of earnings 

$250,000 for future loss of earning capacity.

 

See more:- http://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/home/contact+us

/news/judgmenthandeddowninkalosvgoodyearanddunloptyresaustplandanor  

 

   Contact Us

   Privacy Policy

   Site Map